Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Espinoza v. Sanchez, 98-41170 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-41170 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 09, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41170 No. B-96-CV-71 MARCELINA ESPINOZA, Individually and on behalf of Estate of ADRIAN ESPINOZA; JOSE E. ESPINOZA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JOSE LUIS SANCHEZ, In his Individual Capacity, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas February 4, 2000 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We have carefully considered this interlocutory app
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41170 No. B-96-CV-71 MARCELINA ESPINOZA, Individually and on behalf of Estate of ADRIAN ESPINOZA; JOSE E. ESPINOZA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JOSE LUIS SANCHEZ, In his Individual Capacity, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas February 4, 2000 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We have carefully considered this interlocutory appeal in light of the briefs, oral argument, the district court opinion and pertinent portions of the record. Like the district court, we conclude that material questions of fact precluded the grant of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. For this reason, the appeal is DISMISSED. DISMISSED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer