Dewberry v. Texas Utilities, 99-10912 (2000)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 99-10912
Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 17, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10912 Summary Calendar WILLIAM C DEWBERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, VERSUS TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:98-CV-1889-G) February 17, 2000 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* William C. Dewberry appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Texas Utilities Electric Company dismissing D
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10912 Summary Calendar WILLIAM C DEWBERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, VERSUS TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:98-CV-1889-G) February 17, 2000 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* William C. Dewberry appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Texas Utilities Electric Company dismissing De..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10912 Summary Calendar WILLIAM C DEWBERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, VERSUS TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:98-CV-1889-G) February 17, 2000 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* William C. Dewberry appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Texas Utilities Electric Company dismissing Dewberry’s claims of race discrimination and retaliation. The claims arose out of Dewberry’s employment with Texas Utilities and its decisions to not promote Dewberry to any of three positions. Having carefully reviewed the record and studied the briefs of counsel, we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons set forth by the district court in its Memorandum Order dated July 15, 1999. AFFIRMED * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
