Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Borninski v. Texas Instruments, 99-10971 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-10971 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 11, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10971 Summary Calendar JACK W. BORNINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:97-CV-1531-L) February 10, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* In June 1997, Jack W. Borninski sued his former employer, Texas Instruments, Inc., asserting claims of discrimination under the Amer
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10971 Summary Calendar JACK W. BORNINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:97-CV-1531-L) February 10, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* In June 1997, Jack W. Borninski sued his former employer, Texas Instruments, Inc., asserting claims of discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act, claims under the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act, and interference with contract and breach of contract. After protracted and delayed discovery processes, Texas Instruments moved for summary judgment in November 1998. In July 1999, the district court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting the motions for summary judgment by Texas Instruments. Borninski appealed to this Court. We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order entered under date of July 9, 1999, we affirm the Final Judgment entered in this case under date of July 9, 1999. AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer