Filed: Feb. 16, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-20085 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-20085 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GERARDO GUAPI LIZALDA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-168-4 - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Guapi Lizalda has moved for leave to withdraw an
Summary: No. 99-20085 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-20085 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GERARDO GUAPI LIZALDA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-168-4 - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Guapi Lizalda has moved for leave to withdraw and..
More
No. 99-20085
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-20085
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GERARDO GUAPI LIZALDA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-97-CR-168-4
--------------------
February 16, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Guapi Lizalda
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lizalda has filed
a response to counsel’s motion in which he argues that his trial
counsel was ineffective. The record has not been adequately
developed for us to consider Lizalda’s argument on direct appeal.
See United States v. Haese,
162 F.3d 359, 363-64 (5th Cir 1998),
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-20085
-2-
cert. denied, ___ S. Ct. ___,
1999 WL 241837 (U.S., May 24,
1999). Our independent review of the brief, the record, and
Lizalda’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.