Filed: Apr. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-30813 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30813 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MELINDA B. COLVILLE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-60012-1 - April 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Melinda Colville (“Colville”) appeals the sentence following her guilty-plea conviction for mail fraud, 18
Summary: No. 99-30813 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30813 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MELINDA B. COLVILLE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-60012-1 - April 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Melinda Colville (“Colville”) appeals the sentence following her guilty-plea conviction for mail fraud, 18 ..
More
No. 99-30813
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-30813
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MELINDA B. COLVILLE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 99-CR-60012-1
--------------------
April 13, 2000
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Melinda Colville (“Colville”) appeals the sentence following
her guilty-plea conviction for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 & 2.
She argues that the district court erred when it refused to
depart downward from the guideline range, pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§ 5K2.13, because it mistakenly believed that it was without
authority to do so.
We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate
record and concluded that the district court was aware that it
possessed the authority to depart downward from the guideline
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-30813
-2-
range pursuant to § 5K2.13. See United States v. Carmouche,
138
F.3d 1014, 1018 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Keller,
947
F.2d 739, 741 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.