Filed: Mar. 10, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-31021 Document: 00511406441 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 10, 2011 No. 09-31021 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEVON RAY ALEXANDER, Also Known as Steron R. Alexander, Also Known as Steven D. Alexander, Also Known as Steven C. Alexander, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the We
Summary: Case: 09-31021 Document: 00511406441 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 10, 2011 No. 09-31021 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEVON RAY ALEXANDER, Also Known as Steron R. Alexander, Also Known as Steven D. Alexander, Also Known as Steven C. Alexander, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Wes..
More
Case: 09-31021 Document: 00511406441 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
March 10, 2011
No. 09-31021
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEVON RAY ALEXANDER,
Also Known as Steron R. Alexander, Also Known as Steven D. Alexander,
Also Known as Steven C. Alexander,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:07-CR-20028-1
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Stevon Alexander appeals the 180-month sentence imposed following his
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 09-31021 Document: 00511406441 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2011
No. 09-31021
guilty plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute fifty grams or more
of crack cocaine. He argues that the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”) should
apply retroactively to reduce his sentence.
Congress passed the FSA, Pub. L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372, after Alex-
ander had been sentenced and had filed his appeal. As a result of that act, 21
U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) now requires that a defendant possess over 280 grams of
crack cocaine, rather than 50 grams, for the 10-year mandatory minimum to ap-
ply. Alexander claims that the act is retroactive and that he should be resen-
tenced under the new statute.
This claim is without merit. The FSA does not apply retroactively to de-
fendants, like Alexander, who were sentenced before its enactment. See United
States v. Doggins, No. 09-40925,
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2413, at *10-*11 (5th Cir.
Feb. 9, 2011).
AFFIRMED.
2