Filed: Apr. 17, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-60340 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60340 Conference Calendar JOHN W. STEVENS, Petitioner-Appellant, versus KHURSHID Z. YUSUFF; MIKE MOORE, Respondents-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:99-CV-86-BrS - April 14, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John W. Stevens, federal prisoner #86451-071, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U
Summary: No. 99-60340 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60340 Conference Calendar JOHN W. STEVENS, Petitioner-Appellant, versus KHURSHID Z. YUSUFF; MIKE MOORE, Respondents-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:99-CV-86-BrS - April 14, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John W. Stevens, federal prisoner #86451-071, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U...
More
No. 99-60340
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60340
Conference Calendar
JOHN W. STEVENS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
KHURSHID Z. YUSUFF; MIKE MOORE,
Respondents-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 5:99-CV-86-BrS
--------------------
April 14, 2000
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John W. Stevens, federal prisoner #86451-071, appeals the
district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The
district court dismissed Stevens’s petition for lack of subject-
matter jurisdiction. Stevens has not argued this jurisdictional
issue on appeal; accordingly, he has abandoned any argument that
the dismissal was erroneous. See United States v. Heacock,
31
F.3d 249, 258 (5th Cir. 1994). We DISMISS the appeal as
frivolous. See Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.
1993); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.