Filed: May 04, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-60527 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60527 Summary Calendar SAJJAD HAIDER RIZVI; IQRAR HAIDER RIZVI; NABIHA HAIDER RIZVI; MUBASHIRA SAJJAD RIZVI, Petitioners, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA Nos. A29-924-885 A71-509-654 A71-509-655 A71-509-656 - - - - - - - - - - May 3, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Summary: No. 99-60527 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60527 Summary Calendar SAJJAD HAIDER RIZVI; IQRAR HAIDER RIZVI; NABIHA HAIDER RIZVI; MUBASHIRA SAJJAD RIZVI, Petitioners, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA Nos. A29-924-885 A71-509-654 A71-509-655 A71-509-656 - - - - - - - - - - May 3, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. P..
More
No. 99-60527
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60527
Summary Calendar
SAJJAD HAIDER RIZVI;
IQRAR HAIDER RIZVI;
NABIHA HAIDER RIZVI;
MUBASHIRA SAJJAD RIZVI,
Petitioners,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - -
Petition for Review of an Order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA Nos.
A29-924-885
A71-509-654
A71-509-655
A71-509-656
- - - - - - - - - -
May 3, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ decision dismissing the appeal from the immigration
judge’s decision to deny an application for asylum. We have
reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the
decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence. See
Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS,
78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-60527
-2-
petition for review is DENIED.