Filed: Jun. 08, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30715 USDC No. 98-CV-3724 MELVIN L. BRITTON, Petitioner-Appellant, versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana - June 8, 2000 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Melvin L. Britton, Louisiana state prisoner # 125209, requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30715 USDC No. 98-CV-3724 MELVIN L. BRITTON, Petitioner-Appellant, versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana - June 8, 2000 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Melvin L. Britton, Louisiana state prisoner # 125209, requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-30715
USDC No. 98-CV-3724
MELVIN L. BRITTON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
BURL CAIN, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
---------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
---------------------
June 8, 2000
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Melvin L. Britton, Louisiana state prisoner # 125209,
requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the
district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus
petition as untimely under § 2244(d). See § 2253(c)(1)(A).
Because Britton has shown that the district court erred by
finding that the statute of limitations was not tolled by his
state postconviction application, and therefore, “that jurists of
reason would find it debatable whether the district court was
correct in its procedural ruling,” a COA is hereby GRANTED. See
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-30715
- 2 -
Slack v. McDaniel,
120 S. Ct. 1595,
2000 WL 478879 (U.S. April
26, 2000) (No. 98-6322); Smith v. Ward, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir.
Apr. 7, 2000, No. 98-30444),
2000 WL 358294. The district
court’s judgment denying habeas relief on the basis of the time-
bar of § 2244(d) is hereby VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to
the district court for consideration of the constitutional claims
set forth in Britton’s habeas petition.
VACATED and REMANDED.