Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Newton v. Johnson, 99-50114 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-50114 Visitors: 30
Filed: May 25, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-50114 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50114 Summary Calendar JOHN WADE NEWTON, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-98-CV-662-JN - May 17, 2000 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Wade Newton, Texas state prisoner #8110
More
                           No. 99-50114
                                -1-

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 99-50114
                         Summary Calendar



                         JOHN WADE NEWTON,

                                             Petitioner-Appellant,

                              VERSUS

                    GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,
                   TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL
                 JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

                                             Respondent-Appellee.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. A-98-CV-662-JN
                       --------------------
                           May 17, 2000

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     John Wade Newton, Texas state prisoner #811048, appeals from

the district court’s dismissal of his federal habeas petition as

time-barred.   Because Newton failed to address in his appellate

brief the issue upon which this court granted a certificate of

appealability, whether the district court erred by dismissing his

habeas petition as time-barred, he has abandoned this issue.     See

Yohey v. Collins, 
985 F.2d 222
, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).   Accordingly,

the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.     Newton’s motion

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 99-50114
                               -2-

for time enlargement, construed as a motion for an extension of

time in which to file a reply brief, is DENIED.

     AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer