Filed: Jun. 07, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50852 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE OSCAR TRUJILLO-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-99-CR-348-1 - June 1, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Oscar Trujillo-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has fil
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50852 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE OSCAR TRUJILLO-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-99-CR-348-1 - June 1, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Oscar Trujillo-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has file..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50852
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE OSCAR TRUJILLO-RAMIREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. DR-99-CR-348-1
--------------------
June 1, 2000
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose
Oscar Trujillo-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Trujillo has received a copy of counsel’s motion and
brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. See
id. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.