Filed: Mar. 14, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-10605 Document: 00511407954 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 11, 2011 No. 10-10605 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHRISTOPHER EVERETT MARSH, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:10-CR-3-1 Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM
Summary: Case: 10-10605 Document: 00511407954 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 11, 2011 No. 10-10605 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHRISTOPHER EVERETT MARSH, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:10-CR-3-1 Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:..
More
Case: 10-10605 Document: 00511407954 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
March 11, 2011
No. 10-10605
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CHRISTOPHER EVERETT MARSH,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:10-CR-3-1
Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher Everett
Marsh has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Marsh has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.