Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Biggs v. The City of Baytown, 99-20392 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-20392 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 07, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 99-20392 KIMBERLY DAGLE BIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; ET AL., Defendants, THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; MARVIN CURRIE, Officer, Defendants-Appellees, CHARLES SHAFFER, Chief of Police, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (H-96-CV-1203) June 28, 2000 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the record and based on the bri
More
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         For the Fifth Circuit



                                 No. 99-20392




                           KIMBERLY DAGLE BIGGS,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    VERSUS


                     THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; ET AL.,


                                                               Defendants,

             THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; MARVIN CURRIE, Officer,


                                                         Defendants-Appellees,

                  CHARLES SHAFFER, Chief of Police,


                                                         Defendant-Appellant.


             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  For the Southern District of Texas
                            (H-96-CV-1203)

                                 June 28, 2000

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     After     reviewing   the    record   and   based    on   the   briefs   and

arguments of counsel, we are satisfied that the district court


     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
correctly concluded that material issues of fact were presented on

Chief   Shaffer’s   qualified   immunity   defense   to   Biggs’   sex

discrimination claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.         Accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

     APPEAL DISMISSED.




                                  2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer