Filed: Mar. 16, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-30741 Document: 00511412500 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 16, 2011 No. 10-30741 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JAMES M BOONE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SCOOTER STORE; ABULLA AEMA, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10-CV-1059 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 10-30741 Document: 00511412500 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 16, 2011 No. 10-30741 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JAMES M BOONE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SCOOTER STORE; ABULLA AEMA, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10-CV-1059 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* J..
More
Case: 10-30741 Document: 00511412500 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
March 16, 2011
No. 10-30741
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
JAMES M BOONE,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
SCOOTER STORE; ABULLA AEMA,
Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:10-CV-1059
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
James M. Boone seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his
appeal from the district court’s denial of his request to proceed IFP in the instant
suit, which is based on diversity of citizenship. Boone insists that the district
court erred by denying his IFP motion because he is impecunious. Boone’s
arguments are insufficient to show that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on
appeal. See Carson v. Polley,
689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Consequently,
his IFP motion is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 TH
C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.