Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Martinez, 00-40053 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-40053 Visitors: 24
Filed: Aug. 04, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40053 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL MARTINEZ, also known as Martin Garcia-Valdez, also known as Jose Manuel Castro- Valdez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-387-1 - August 3, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ma
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-40053
                          Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL MARTINEZ, also known
as Martin Garcia-Valdez, also
known as Jose Manuel Castro-
Valdez,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. B-99-CR-387-1
                       --------------------
                          August 3, 2000
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel

Martinez has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Martinez

received a copy of counsel's motion and brief but has not filed a

response.   Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.   Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.    See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer