IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 98-40869
                           Summary Calendar



GUSTAVO ALMAGUER,

                                          Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,
Texas Department of Criminal
Justice, Institutional Division,

                                          Respondent-Appellee.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 98-CV-2
                      --------------------
                         August 10, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Gustavo Almaguer, Texas state prisoner # 673522, argues that

the district court erred in dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

habeas corpus petition as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d)(1).   Almaguer argues that the district court relied on

the prison mail log, which contained inaccurate information, in

dismissing his petition.    Almaguer also argues that the

limitations period was equitably tolled for various reasons.

     The district court did not grant a certificate of

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                             No. 98-40869
                                  -2-

appealability (COA) on the equitable-tolling issue, and Almaguer

has not filed a motion for COA with this court seeking review of

that issue.   Therefore, the equitable-tolling issue is not within

the scope of the court’s review.    See Lackey v. Johnson, 

, 151 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Kimler, 

,

430 (5th Cir. 1998).

     A prisoner’s habeas petition is deemed filed when delivered

to prison authorities for mailing to the district court.    Sonnier

v. Johnson, 

, 945 n.2 (5th Cir. 1998).    The district

court appears to have granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss

based on a misconception that the date that a prisoner’s petition

is “mailed” from the prison to the district court determines the

filing date for limitations purposes.

     It is not clear from the prison mail log whether Almaguer

delivered the petition to prison authorities on December 31 or if

the petition was mailed by the prison on that date.   If Almaguer

delivered the petition to prison officials on or before December

24, 1997, the petition was filed timely.

     The district court’s judgment is VACATED, and the case is

REMANDED to the district court to determine the date that

Almaguer delivered the petition to prison officials for mailing.

     Almaguer’s motion requesting consideration of equitable-

tolling issues, which was filed approximately eight months after

his initial brief, is DENIED.

     VACATED AND REMANDED.