Elaine Seid v. Univ of MS Medical Center, 10-60577 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 10-60577
Visitors: 70
Filed: May 10, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-60577 Document: 00511472844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/10/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 10, 2011 No. 10-60577 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ELAINE SEID, Plaintiff–Appellant v. UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER; DIANE DUKES, individually and in her official capacity; JOHN DOES, 1-10, Defendants–Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:07-CV-
Summary: Case: 10-60577 Document: 00511472844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/10/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 10, 2011 No. 10-60577 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ELAINE SEID, Plaintiff–Appellant v. UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER; DIANE DUKES, individually and in her official capacity; JOHN DOES, 1-10, Defendants–Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:07-CV-4..
More
Case: 10-60577 Document: 00511472844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/10/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 10, 2011 No. 10-60577 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ELAINE SEID, Plaintiff–Appellant v. UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER; DIANE DUKES, individually and in her official capacity; JOHN DOES, 1-10, Defendants–Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:07-CV-442 Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Elaine Seid appeals the district court’s Judgment dismissing her complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the briefs, pertinent portions of the record, and the applicable law. We find no error in the district court’s dismissal and we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
