Filed: May 12, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-20425 Document: 00511476047 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 12, 2011 No. 10-20425 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk SHARON M. SCOTT, Independent Executrix for the Estate of Edward O. Matthews; JUNE REGISTER, Co-Trustee of the Dorothy J. Matthews Marital Trust; LANDIS KRIEGEL, Co-Trustee of the Dorothy J. Matthews Marital Trust; SALVADOR E. RODRIGUEZ, Co-Trustee of the Dorothy J. Matthews
Summary: Case: 10-20425 Document: 00511476047 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 12, 2011 No. 10-20425 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk SHARON M. SCOTT, Independent Executrix for the Estate of Edward O. Matthews; JUNE REGISTER, Co-Trustee of the Dorothy J. Matthews Marital Trust; LANDIS KRIEGEL, Co-Trustee of the Dorothy J. Matthews Marital Trust; SALVADOR E. RODRIGUEZ, Co-Trustee of the Dorothy J. Matthews M..
More
Case: 10-20425 Document: 00511476047 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
May 12, 2011
No. 10-20425 Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
SHARON M. SCOTT, Independent Executrix for the Estate of Edward O.
Matthews; JUNE REGISTER, Co-Trustee of the Dorothy J. Matthews
Marital Trust; LANDIS KRIEGEL, Co-Trustee of the Dorothy J. Matthews
Marital Trust; SALVADOR E. RODRIGUEZ, Co-Trustee of the Dorothy J.
Matthews Marital Trust,
Plaintiffs – Appellants
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:00-CV-4131
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for essentially the reasons
set forth by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion, Matthews v. United
States,
2010 WL 2305750 (S.D. Tex. June 8, 2010).
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.