Filed: Sep. 11, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-10343 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BETTY JEAN GREEN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-251-1 - September 5, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Betty Jean Green has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-10343 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BETTY JEAN GREEN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-251-1 - September 5, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Betty Jean Green has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-10343
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BETTY JEAN GREEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
---------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:99-CR-251-1
---------------------
September 5, 2000
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Betty Jean Green has filed a motion
to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Green was sent a copy of counsel’s motion and brief,
but she has not filed a response. Our review of the brief filed by
counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous point for
appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.