Filed: Oct. 17, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-51001 _ KENNETH F. McMAHAN; BETTY F. McMAHAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas SA-98-CV-491-OG _ October 17, 2000 Before WOOD*, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:** Resolution of the only significant issue presented by this appeal is controlled by the decision of the Texas Supreme Court in Stringer
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-51001 _ KENNETH F. McMAHAN; BETTY F. McMAHAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas SA-98-CV-491-OG _ October 17, 2000 Before WOOD*, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:** Resolution of the only significant issue presented by this appeal is controlled by the decision of the Texas Supreme Court in Stringer v..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
________________________________
No. 99-51001
________________________________
KENNETH F. McMAHAN; BETTY F. McMAHAN,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
V.
LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
_____________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Western District of Texas
SA-98-CV-491-OG
_____________________________________________
October 17, 2000
Before WOOD*, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:**
Resolution of the only significant issue presented by this
appeal is controlled by the decision of the Texas Supreme Court in
Stringer v. Cendant Mortgage Corp.,
23 S.W.3d 353 (Tex. 2000); see
also Stringer v. Cendant Mortgage Corp., No. 99-40100,
2000 WL
1425121 (5th Cir. Sept. 27, 2000) (per curiam). Accordingly, we
AFFIRM the decision of the United States District Court dismissing
the case.
AFFIRMED.
*
Circuit Judge of the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.
**
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.