Filed: Oct. 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-51005 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROSA ALARCON RODRIGUEZ-PALMA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-99-CR-39-15 - October 19, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Rosa Alarcon Rodriguez-Palma has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a bri
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-51005 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROSA ALARCON RODRIGUEZ-PALMA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-99-CR-39-15 - October 19, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Rosa Alarcon Rodriguez-Palma has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brie..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-51005
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROSA ALARCON RODRIGUEZ-PALMA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-99-CR-39-15
--------------------
October 19, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Rosa Alarcon Rodriguez-Palma
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez has
received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See
id.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.