Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kenholz v. Bache, 13095_1 (1950)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13095_1 Visitors: 37
Filed: Nov. 08, 1950
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 184 F.2d 974 KENHOLZ v. BACHE et al. No. 13095. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. November 8, 1950. Herbert S. Shapiro, Richard E. Gerstein, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellant. Melvin J. Richard, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellees. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The suit, based on diversity and amount, was brought by appellant, plaintiff below, under Sec. 517.21, Florida Statutes Annotated, to recover the full purchase price paid by him
More

184 F.2d 974

KENHOLZ
v.
BACHE et al.

No. 13095.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

November 8, 1950.

Herbert S. Shapiro, Richard E. Gerstein, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellant.

Melvin J. Richard, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The suit, based on diversity and amount, was brought by appellant, plaintiff below, under Sec. 517.21, Florida Statutes Annotated, to recover the full purchase price paid by him for securities bought of defendants, together with interest as provided for therein and all taxable court costs.

2

In support of the allegation that the amount in controversy was in excess of $3,000.00, to-wit $3,136.25, plaintiff alleged that the purchase was of 100 shares of the capital stock of Taca Airways at a price of $23.75 per share, or a total price of $2,375.00, together with $261.25 interest thereon and $500.00 as reasonable attorney's fees.

3

Defendant, moving to dismiss, not on the ground of want of jurisdiction but because the complaint failed to state a claim against the defendants upon which relief could be granted, the motion was sustained, the cause was dismissed, and plaintiff appealed.

4

Here both appellant and appellees, the one insisting that the judgment should be reversed, the other that it should be affirmed, have argued the merits of the case as pleaded.

5

Of the opinion that from the complaint itself, it clearly appears that the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs1 is less than $3,000.00 and that the court is without jurisdiction of the cause, we are compelled of our own motion to take notice that this is so and to order the judgment reversed and the cause dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

6

Judgment reversed and cause dismissed.

Notes:

1

Sec. 1332, Title 28 U.S.C.A

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer