Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Olaniyi-Oke, 00-50105 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-50105 Visitors: 28
Filed: Dec. 13, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50105 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JACKSON AYOBAM OLANIYI-OKE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-98-CR-81-1-SS - December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jackson Ayobam Olaniyi-Oke appeals the sentence he received after his case was remanded for resentencing in United
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-50105
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACKSON AYOBAM OLANIYI-OKE,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. A-98-CR-81-1-SS
                       --------------------
                         December 13, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jackson Ayobam Olaniyi-Oke appeals the sentence he received

after his case was remanded for resentencing in United States v.

Olaniyi-Oke, 
199 F.3d 767
(5th Cir. 1999).    He contends that the

district court erred by declining to hold a hearing regarding the

applicability of a downward departure based upon mitigating

circumstances prior to his resentencing.    As the issue of a

downward departure is beyond the scope of remand, the district

court did not err in refusing to hold a sentencing hearing.       See

United States v. Marmolejo, 
139 F.3d 528
, 530-31 (5th Cir. 1998).

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 00-50105
                               -2-

     Olaniyi-Oke also asserts that his counsel at sentencing was

ineffective for failing to move for the aforementioned downward

departure at the first sentencing hearing.    However, in the

present state of the record, we could only speculate as to the

reasons for any of counsel’s actions and omissions.     See United

States v. Thomas, 
12 F.3d 1350
, 1368 (5th Cir. 1994).    He may

raise this issue in an appropriate proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §

2255.   
Id. Accordingly, the
judgment is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer