Filed: Dec. 26, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20366 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADIELE C. ONWUASOANYA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-91-CR-218-1 - December 19, 2000 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, CIRCUIT JUDGES. PER CURIAM:* In this direct criminal appeal, Adiele C. Onwuasoanya complains that his guilty plea was involuntary because the district cour
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20366 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADIELE C. ONWUASOANYA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-91-CR-218-1 - December 19, 2000 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, CIRCUIT JUDGES. PER CURIAM:* In this direct criminal appeal, Adiele C. Onwuasoanya complains that his guilty plea was involuntary because the district court..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20366
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ADIELE C. ONWUASOANYA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-91-CR-218-1
--------------------
December 19, 2000
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, CIRCUIT JUDGES.
PER CURIAM:*
In this direct criminal appeal, Adiele C. Onwuasoanya
complains that his guilty plea was involuntary because the district
court violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and the Due Process Clause of
the Fifth Amendment by misinforming him of the nature of the
conspiracy charge against him.
Our review of the record and the arguments and
authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed.
The specific facts of the plea colloquy and record demonstrate that
any Rule 11 error in this case, if it occurred, was harmless error
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-20366
-2-
and that Onwuasoanya understood the charge against him. See United
States v. Reyna,
130 F.3d 104, 110-12 (5th Cir. 1997).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.