Filed: Dec. 15, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30176 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ESTRADA-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-3-ALL-B - December 14, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 Jose Estrada-Aguirre (“Estrada-Aguirre”) was convicted of illegally reentering the United States following deportation,
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-30176 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ESTRADA-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CR-3-ALL-B - December 14, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 Jose Estrada-Aguirre (“Estrada-Aguirre”) was convicted of illegally reentering the United States following deportation, p..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-30176
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE ESTRADA-AGUIRRE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 99-CR-3-ALL-B
--------------------
December 14, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
Jose Estrada-Aguirre (“Estrada-Aguirre”) was convicted of
illegally reentering the United States following deportation,
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and possessing a counterfeited alien
registration card, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a). He appeals
only his illegal reentry conviction. Estrada-Aguirre argues that
insufficient evidence existed to support the conviction because the
Government failed to present sufficient evidence of his alienage.
This court has reviewed the record and the briefs of the
parties. It concludes that sufficient evidence existed to support
Estrada-Aguirre’s conviction. See United States v. Garcia, 995
1
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
F.2d 556, 561 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment of the district court
is AFFIRMED.
2