Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. O'Grady, 00-40509 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-40509 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 02, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-40509 Summary Calendar Civil Docket #B-99-CR-460-1 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRY O’GRADY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas _ February 1, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent Terry O’Grady has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as requi
More
                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                      _______________________

                            No. 00-40509
                          Summary Calendar
                    Civil Docket #B-99-CR-460-1
                      _______________________


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                              versus

TERRY O’GRADY,

                                                Defendant-Appellant.


_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
_________________________________________________________________
                          February 1, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

          The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent

Terry O’Grady has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).     O’Grady

has received a copy of the FPD’s motion and brief but has not filed

a response.    Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue.   Accordingly, the FPD’s motion to


     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
withdraw   is   GRANTED.   The   FPD   is   excused   from   further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2.




                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer