Cooper v. Kilgore Junior Clge, 00-40677 (2001)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 00-40677
Visitors: 39
Filed: Jan. 26, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40677 Summary Calendar ESSIE T. COOPER, Planitiff-Appellant, versus KILGORE JUNIOR COLLEGE; WILLIAM HOLDA, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (USDC No. 6:98-CV-556) _ January 25, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-appellant Essie T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40677 Summary Calendar ESSIE T. COOPER, Planitiff-Appellant, versus KILGORE JUNIOR COLLEGE; WILLIAM HOLDA, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (USDC No. 6:98-CV-556) _ January 25, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-appellant Essie T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and c..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40677 Summary Calendar ESSIE T. COOPER, Planitiff-Appellant, versus KILGORE JUNIOR COLLEGE; WILLIAM HOLDA, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (USDC No. 6:98-CV-556) _______________________________________________________ January 25, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-appellant Essie T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions and entering summary judgment for * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. the defendants. Cooper’s claims are time-barred for the reasons given in the magistrate judge’s report of April 11, 2000. Affirmed. 2
Source: CourtListener
