Filed: Feb. 05, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 00-60486 Summary Calendar CURTIS MCGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi (2:98-CV-336-PG) February 5, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Curtis McGee (“McGee”) brought suit against his former employer, Kimberly Clark Corporation (“Kimberly Clark”), in the United States District Cou
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 00-60486 Summary Calendar CURTIS MCGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi (2:98-CV-336-PG) February 5, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Curtis McGee (“McGee”) brought suit against his former employer, Kimberly Clark Corporation (“Kimberly Clark”), in the United States District Cour..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 00-60486
Summary Calendar
CURTIS MCGEE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Mississippi
(2:98-CV-336-PG)
February 5, 2001
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Curtis McGee (“McGee”) brought suit against his former
employer, Kimberly Clark Corporation (“Kimberly Clark”), in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of
Mississippi alleging race and gender discrimination under Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), et seq.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Kimberly Clark answered alleging that McGee was discharged after an
internal investigation confirmed that he had sexually harassed a
female contract worker. Specifically, in a telephone conversation
with the woman in question, McGee requested that she perform sexual
favors in exchange for job benefits including a pay raise.
Kimberly Clark moved for summary judgment which the district court
granted. McGee appeals to this Court.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,
and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated
by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order filed
under date of June 20, 2000, we affirm the grant of summary
judgment in favor of Kimberly Clark and the dismissal of
plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice.
AFFIRMED.
2