Filed: Mar. 07, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20090 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VIRGIL MALATEK, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-176-8 - March 6, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Virgil Malatek has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20090 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VIRGIL MALATEK, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-176-8 - March 6, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Virgil Malatek has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20090
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VIRGIL MALATEK,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-99-CR-176-8
--------------------
March 6, 2001
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Virgil Malatek has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Malatek did not file a response
to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of
counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
appellate issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
