Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Celedon, 00-20399 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-20399 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 16, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20399 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOEL CELEDON, also known as Angel Gonzalez-Soto, also known as Joel Celedon-Rios, also known as Abel C. Gonzalez, also known as Abel Soto, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-710-ALL - February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER C
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-20399
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus


JOEL CELEDON, also known as Angel Gonzalez-Soto,
also known as Joel Celedon-Rios, also known as
Abel C. Gonzalez, also known as Abel Soto,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. H-99-CR-710-ALL
                      --------------------
                        February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Celedon has received a copy of counsel’s brief

and motion but has not filed a response.    Our independent review

of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer