Filed: Feb. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30702 Conference Calendar ANNIE L. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KEVIN DUPUIS, Deputy, both individually and in his official capacity, BARTON PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES; ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-602-B - February 13, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circ
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30702 Conference Calendar ANNIE L. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KEVIN DUPUIS, Deputy, both individually and in his official capacity, BARTON PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES; ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-602-B - February 13, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circu..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30702 Conference Calendar ANNIE L. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KEVIN DUPUIS, Deputy, both individually and in his official capacity, BARTON PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES; ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-602-B -------------------- February 13, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Annie L. Thompson has failed to comply with this court’s September 5, 2000, order requiring her to submit within 30 days a computer disk containing a copy of her appellate and reply briefs for the purpose of confirming her certification that the briefs comply with the page/word limitations under Fed. R. App. P. 32 and warning her that failure to comply would result in the imposition of sanctions, including the possibility that her * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-30702 -2- briefs would be stricken. Accordingly, her briefs are STRICKEN. See Fed. R. App. P. 32(a) and 5TH CIR. R. 32.3. Her appeal is DISMISSED. See Fed. R. App. P. 42 and 5TH CIR. R. 42.3.3. BRIEFS STRICKEN; APPEAL DISMISSED.