Filed: Apr. 10, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-51115 Conference Calendar JOHN LEE COOK, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-00-CV-28 - April 10, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Lee Cook, Sr., former Texas prisoner 672488, argues that the district court erred in dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-51115 Conference Calendar JOHN LEE COOK, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-00-CV-28 - April 10, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Lee Cook, Sr., former Texas prisoner 672488, argues that the district court erred in dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-51115
Conference Calendar
JOHN LEE COOK, SR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-00-CV-28
--------------------
April 10, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John Lee Cook, Sr., former Texas prisoner 672488, argues
that the district court erred in dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because the
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles (“Board”) illegally extended
his sentence by denying him parole or revoking his parole based
on void convictions, evidence of substance abuse relied upon in
prior proceedings, or unauthenticated evidence of substance
abuse. Cook is seeking only monetary compensation from the
Board.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-51115
-2-
Cook has not challenged the district court’s dismissal of
his complaint against the Board based on Eleventh Amendment
immunity. Thus, he has abandoned the sole ground for appeal.
See Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).
Because Cook has failed to raise an issue of arguable merit,
the appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Cook’s request for injunctive relief is DENIED.