Filed: Apr. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20097 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TRON WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-430-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Tron Washington on appeal has moved to withdraw and has fil
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20097 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TRON WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-430-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Tron Washington on appeal has moved to withdraw and has file..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20097
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TRON WASHINGTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-99-CR-430-1
- - - - - - - - - -
April 12, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Tron Washington on appeal has
moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Washington has received a copy
of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R.
42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
