Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Pena-Perez, 00-20838 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-20838 Visitors: 59
Filed: Apr. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20838 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFONSO PENA-PEREZ, also known as Nicolas Arambula-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-207-1 - April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alfonso Pena-Perez appeals the 85-month sentence imposed following his plea of gu
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-20838
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFONSO PENA-PEREZ,
also known as Nicolas Arambula-Hernandez,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. H-00-CR-207-1
                      --------------------
                         April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Alfonso Pena-Perez appeals the 85-month sentence imposed

following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the

United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his

increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of

the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.

     Pena-Perez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 00-20838
                               -2-

States, 
523 U.S. 224
(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
, 
120 S. Ct. 2348
(2000).

     Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See 
Apprendi, 120 S. Ct. at 2362
; United States v. Dabeit, 
231 F.3d 979
, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
121 S. Ct. 1214
(2001).   Pena-

Perez’s argument is foreclosed.   The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer