Filed: Apr. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50865 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROJELIO ELEAZAR GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-00-CR-20-2 April 30, 2001 Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Eva-Marie Leahey, court appointed counsel for Rojelio Eleazar Gonzalez, has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50865 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROJELIO ELEAZAR GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-00-CR-20-2 April 30, 2001 Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Eva-Marie Leahey, court appointed counsel for Rojelio Eleazar Gonzalez, has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50865
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROJELIO ELEAZAR GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-00-CR-20-2
April 30, 2001
Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
Eva-Marie Leahey, court appointed counsel for Rojelio Eleazar Gonzalez, has
moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez has received a copy of counsel’s motion
and brief but has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 42.2 the appeal is
DISMISSED.
2