Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Gonzalez, 00-50865 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-50865 Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50865 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROJELIO ELEAZAR GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-00-CR-20-2 April 30, 2001 Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Eva-Marie Leahey, court appointed counsel for Rojelio Eleazar Gonzalez, has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief
More
                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                           FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                                   No. 00-50865
                                 Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                       versus

ROJELIO ELEAZAR GONZALEZ,
                                                    Defendant-Appellant.



                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. P-00-CR-20-2

                                   April 30, 2001

Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

      Eva-Marie Leahey, court appointed counsel for Rojelio Eleazar Gonzalez, has

moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.


      *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Gonzalez has received a copy of counsel’s motion

and brief but has not filed a response.

      Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 42.2 the appeal is

DISMISSED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer