Filed: Apr. 16, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-51125 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAUL CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-887-ALL - - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Raul Castro appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry a
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-51125 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAUL CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-887-ALL - - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Raul Castro appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry af..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-51125
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAUL CASTRO,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-00-CR-887-ALL
- - - - - - - - - -
April 12, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Raul Castro appeals his sentence following his guilty plea
conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326. Castro argues that his sentence should not have
exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Castro acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he
seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of
Apprendi v. New Jersey,
120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-51125
- 2 -
Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See
Apprendi,
120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit,
231 F.3d 979, 984
(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,
121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Castro’s
argument is foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 235.
The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of
filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks
that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an
appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.