IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                                       No. 00-40219
                                     Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                            Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                             versus


DAVID GARCES,
                                                            Defendant-Appellant.

                   _________________________________________
                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                          for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. M-98-CR-444-4
                   _________________________________________
                                    May 16, 2001
Before POLITZ, JOLLY, AND EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

       David Garces appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea
conviction for possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §

841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(B). Garces contends that the district court erred in sentencing

him as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 because his prior felony drug


       *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
convictions were related and were part of a common scheme or plan. Garces did
not raise this issue in the trial court and our review therefore is limited to correcting

plain error.1 Our review of the record and briefs convinces us that the district court

did not err in sentencing Garces as a career offender.2 Viewing Garces
appropriately as a career offender, the trial court properly assessed his guideline

range and legally imposed his sentence. Any error that may have been committed in

calculating the criminal history score necessarily is deemed harmless given Garces’

status as a career offender.3
       The sentence appealed is AFFIRMED.




       1
        Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b).
       2
        United States v. Robinson, 

(5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ford, 

(5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Garcia, 

(5th Cir. 1992).
       3
        U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1.
                                               2