Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Arroyo-Juarez, 00-41189 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-41189 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 11, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41189 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO ARROYO-JUAREZ, also known as Rogelio Ortega-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-132-1 - June 7, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antonio Arroyo-Juarez (“Arroyo”) appeals his conviction for illegal reentry after deportat
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 00-41189
                           Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO ARROYO-JUAREZ,
also known as Rogelio Ortega-Lopez,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. B-00-CR-132-1
                       --------------------
                           June 7, 2001
Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Antonio Arroyo-Juarez (“Arroyo”) appeals his conviction for

illegal reentry after deportation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

He contends that the Government failed to allege his prior

aggravated felony conviction in his indictment.    He also contends

that the district court erred by “double counting” his aggravated

felony conviction to increase both his offense level and criminal

history score.

     Arroyo concedes that his first contention in this appeal is

foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 00-41189
                               -2-

v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998), and that he raises

the issue solely to preserve it for review by the Supreme Court.

Arroyo’s second contention is without merit.   See United States

v. Hawkins, 
69 F.3d 11
, 14 (5th Cir. 1995).    This court affirms

the judgment of the district court.

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer