Filed: May 15, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50399 ESTEBAN VILLEGAS-ALANIS; ET AL., Plaintiffs, ESTEBAN VILLEGAS-ALANIS; SAN JUANITA GONZALES DE VILLEGAS; MARIA DE LA PAZ VILLEGAS; ALEJANDRO VILLEGAS; JUAN ESTEBAN VILLEGAS; JOSE LOPEZ; ANTONIO CAZARES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus JAMES D. WURTH; ROBERT L. SCHEER; MIKE MORRIS; MURRAY EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (DR-99-CV-66) May 14,
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50399 ESTEBAN VILLEGAS-ALANIS; ET AL., Plaintiffs, ESTEBAN VILLEGAS-ALANIS; SAN JUANITA GONZALES DE VILLEGAS; MARIA DE LA PAZ VILLEGAS; ALEJANDRO VILLEGAS; JUAN ESTEBAN VILLEGAS; JOSE LOPEZ; ANTONIO CAZARES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus JAMES D. WURTH; ROBERT L. SCHEER; MIKE MORRIS; MURRAY EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (DR-99-CV-66) May 14, 2..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50399 ESTEBAN VILLEGAS-ALANIS; ET AL., Plaintiffs, ESTEBAN VILLEGAS-ALANIS; SAN JUANITA GONZALES DE VILLEGAS; MARIA DE LA PAZ VILLEGAS; ALEJANDRO VILLEGAS; JUAN ESTEBAN VILLEGAS; JOSE LOPEZ; ANTONIO CAZARES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus JAMES D. WURTH; ROBERT L. SCHEER; MIKE MORRIS; MURRAY EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (DR-99-CV-66) May 14, 2001 Before POLITZ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and FALLON,1 District Judge. PER CURIAM:2 Having considered the briefs, pertinent parts of the record, and the arguments of counsel, and concluding there was no abuse of 1 District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. 2 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. discretion, the denial of a preliminary injunction prior to the district court ruling, inter alia, on personal jurisdiction is affirmed, and this matter is remanded for further appropriate proceedings. AFFIRMED
