Filed: Jun. 11, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit _ No. 00-50422 Summary Calendar _ ANGELITA Z. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, VERSUS EMERY WORLDWIDE, Etc.; ET AL, Defendants, CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORP., Severally and Jointly, Defendant-Appellant, VERSUS LORENZO W. TIJERINA Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas SA-97-CV-1085-FB _ June 7, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the record and briefs of the p
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit _ No. 00-50422 Summary Calendar _ ANGELITA Z. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, VERSUS EMERY WORLDWIDE, Etc.; ET AL, Defendants, CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORP., Severally and Jointly, Defendant-Appellant, VERSUS LORENZO W. TIJERINA Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas SA-97-CV-1085-FB _ June 7, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the record and briefs of the pa..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit ___________________________ No. 00-50422 Summary Calendar ___________________________ ANGELITA Z. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, VERSUS EMERY WORLDWIDE, Etc.; ET AL, Defendants, CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORP., Severally and Jointly, Defendant-Appellant, VERSUS LORENZO W. TIJERINA Appellee. ___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas SA-97-CV-1085-FB ___________________________________________________ June 7, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we are satisfied that the district court did not abuse its considerable discretion in rescinding its earlier award of sanctions for a Rule 11 violation. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.