Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In Re: Ulmer, 00-30625 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-30625 Visitors: 74
Filed: Jul. 06, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-30625 Summary Calendar Civil Docket #99-CV-1658-F _ In The Matter Of: JO ANN ULMER, Debtor. _ DAN FRISARD, Appellant, versus JO ANN ULMER; CYNTHIA TRAINA, Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana _ July 3, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s findings of contempt and imposition of sanctions on Frisard
More
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                        _______________________

                              No. 00-30625
                            Summary Calendar
                       Civil Docket #99-CV-1658-F

                        _______________________

In The Matter Of: JO ANN ULMER,

                                                                    Debtor.
                        _______________________

DAN FRISARD,

                                                                 Appellant,

                                  versus

JO ANN ULMER; CYNTHIA TRAINA,

                                                       Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Eastern District of Louisiana
_________________________________________________________________
                            July 3, 2001


Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

           The   district    court   affirmed   the   bankruptcy    court’s

findings of contempt and imposition of sanctions on Frisard for

violating the automatic stay in bankruptcy, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), and

violating the injunction against a creditor’s interference with a

     *
            Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
debtor whose debt has been discharged, 11 U.S.C. § 524.    Frisard

has appealed the relatively modest monetary awards against him. To

the extent we understand the issues he raises, they are legally and

factually meritless.   He has demonstrated neither clear error of

fact or legal error in the lower courts’ rulings, and we affirm for

essentially the reasons articulated by those courts.

          AFFIRMED.




                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer