Filed: Jun. 21, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-31483 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NELSON L. KING, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (00-CR-10007-2) - June 18, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Nelson L. King, Jr., on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-31483 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NELSON L. KING, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (00-CR-10007-2) - June 18, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Nelson L. King, Jr., on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-31483
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NELSON L. KING, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
(00-CR-10007-2)
--------------------
June 18, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Nelson L. King, Jr., on
appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
King has not filed a response to counsel's motion and brief.
Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R.
42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
DISMISSED.
2