Filed: Jun. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60118 Conference Calendar JOHNNY O’BRYANT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THOMAS G. TAYLOR, Warden at Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; ELMORE SELLERS, Deputy Warden at Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; CAROL BOONE, Classification and Offender Service, Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; KAREN TANNER, Official Court Reporter, 11th Circuit District Court; AELICIA THOMAS, Attorney, MSB # 10792
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60118 Conference Calendar JOHNNY O’BRYANT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THOMAS G. TAYLOR, Warden at Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; ELMORE SELLERS, Deputy Warden at Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; CAROL BOONE, Classification and Offender Service, Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; KAREN TANNER, Official Court Reporter, 11th Circuit District Court; AELICIA THOMAS, Attorney, MSB # 10792;..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-60118
Conference Calendar
JOHNNY O’BRYANT, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
THOMAS G. TAYLOR, Warden at Bolivar County Regional
Correctional Facility; ELMORE SELLERS, Deputy Warden at
Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility; CAROL BOONE,
Classification and Offender Service, Bolivar County Regional
Correctional Facility; KAREN TANNER, Official Court Reporter,
11th Circuit District Court; AELICIA THOMAS, Attorney,
MSB # 10792; KENNETH L. THOMAS, Attorney,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 2:00-CV-259-D-B
--------------------
June 13, 2001
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Johnny O’Bryant, Jr., Mississippi prisoner # 41117, appeals,
pro se, the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for
failure to state a claim. O’Bryant’s motion for appointment of
counsel is denied.
O’Bryant seeks damages, claiming the defendants violated his
rights, resulting in his false imprisonment. As O’Bryant has not
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-60118
-2-
shown that either his conviction, his sentence, or his probation
revocation has been overturned, expunged, or otherwise
invalidated, the district court properly dismissed his complaint
as barred by Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477, 486-87. See also
Jackson v. Vannoy,
49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir. 1995)(Heck applied
to a probation revocation proceeding). The judgment of the
district court is affirmed.
The district court’s dismissal of O’Bryant’s complaint as
frivolous counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
See Adepegba v. Hammons,
103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996).
O’Bryant is cautioned that if he accumulates three “strikes”
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in
any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or
detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of
serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. MOTION DENIED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.