Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rayburn E. Hahn v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 17618 (1959)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 17618 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 23, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 271 F.2d 739 59-2 USTC P 9777 Rayburn E. HAHN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 17618. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Nov. 23, 1959. Rayburn E. Hahn, in pro. per. Arthur I. Gould, Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Rothwacks, Carter Bledsoe, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent. Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit
More

271 F.2d 739

59-2 USTC P 9777

Rayburn E. HAHN, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 17618.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 23, 1959.

Rayburn E. Hahn, in pro. per.

Arthur I. Gould, Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Rothwacks, Carter Bledsoe, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The issue presented here and the facts from which the issue arose are fully set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court. Hahn v. Commissioner, 30 T.C. 195. Since we conclude that the question raised was properly determined, the decision of the Tax Court is

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer