Filed: Jul. 26, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50924 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERNEL DUPREE KING, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-98-CR-90-1 - - - - - - - - - - July 26, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Dernel Dupree King appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction and sentence for possession
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50924 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERNEL DUPREE KING, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-98-CR-90-1 - - - - - - - - - - July 26, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Dernel Dupree King appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction and sentence for possession w..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50924
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DERNEL DUPREE KING,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-98-CR-90-1
- - - - - - - - - -
July 26, 2001
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Dernel Dupree King appeals his conditional guilty-plea
conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute
cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. ยง 841. He argues that the
district court erred in denying his motion to suppress.
We hold that the district court did not err in denying the
motion to suppress. Although King limited the manner in which the
search could be conducted, he did not completely withdraw his
consent to the search, and the investigating officer did not exceed
the limits imposed on the search. See Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-50924
-2-
248 (1991); United States v. McSween,
53 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.