Filed: Aug. 17, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-50864 (Summary Calendar) _ GWENDOLYN L. DOSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee,. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-99-CV-130-JN August 15, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gwendolyn L. Doss appeals from the magistrate judge’s decision affirming the denial of her app
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-50864 (Summary Calendar) _ GWENDOLYN L. DOSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee,. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-99-CV-130-JN August 15, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gwendolyn L. Doss appeals from the magistrate judge’s decision affirming the denial of her appl..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
No. 00-50864
(Summary Calendar)
_________________
GWENDOLYN L. DOSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee,.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-99-CV-130-JN
August 15, 2001
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gwendolyn L. Doss appeals from the magistrate judge’s decision affirming the denial of her
application for disability insurance benefits. She argues that the decision of the administrative law
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
judge is not supported by substantial evidence. More specifically, Doss contends that the
administrative law judge’s determination that she could perform medium work is not supported by
an objective evaluation of the medical evidence.
The administrative law judge applied the proper legal standard in evaluating Doss’s disability
claim, and the decision that Doss was not disabled and is able to perform work in the national
economy is supported by substantial evidence on the record as whole. See Muse v. Sullivan,
925
F.2d 785, 789 (5th Cir. 1991); Anthony v. Sullivan,
954 F.2d 289, 292 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly
the judgment of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED.
-2-