Filed: Aug. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-60588 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TRECE CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:99-CR-108-ALL - August 7, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Kenneth Coghlan, appointed counsel for Trece Clark, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-60588 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TRECE CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:99-CR-108-ALL - August 7, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Kenneth Coghlan, appointed counsel for Trece Clark, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v...
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-60588
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TRECE CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 1:99-CR-108-ALL
--------------------
August 7, 2001
Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kenneth Coghlan, appointed counsel for Trece Clark, has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the brief and the record and Clark's response discloses
no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. Clark's
motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
