Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Garcia-Garcia, 01-40033 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-40033 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40033 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROSELIA GARCIA-GARCIA, also known as Maria Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-197-1 - August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Roselia Garcia-Garcia has moved for leave to withd
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 01-40033
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROSELIA GARCIA-GARCIA, also known as Maria Garcia,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. C-00-CR-197-1
                      --------------------
                         August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Roselia Garcia-Garcia has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).     Garcia has not filed

a response.    Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

if excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer