Filed: Aug. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40055 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DELVITH BURGESS-RETREAGE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-455-1 - August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Delvith Burgess-Retreage has moved for leave to withdra
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40055 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DELVITH BURGESS-RETREAGE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-455-1 - August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Delvith Burgess-Retreage has moved for leave to withdraw..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40055
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DELVITH BURGESS-RETREAGE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-00-CR-455-1
--------------------
August 23, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Delvith
Burgess-Retreage has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Burgess-Retreage was provided with a copy of counsel’s
Anders motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that
there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-40055
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.