Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Snell, 01-40202 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-40202 Visitors: 38
Filed: Sep. 04, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40202 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDDIE SNELL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-319-1 - August 31, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Eddie Snell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 01-40202
                         Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDDIE SNELL,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. C-00-319-1
                      --------------------
                         August 31, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Eddie Snell has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Snell has filed a response to

counsel’s motion to withdraw, requesting new counsel on appeal,

and has filed a motion for an extension of time to file an

appellate brief.   These motions are DENIED.

     Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Snell’s response,

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous appellate issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 01-40202
                                -2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer